FRIDAY 05 DECEMBER, 2008 |

Australian Solar Power Feed In Tariff Update
It was with great anticipation that many overseas investors, home owners and
local stakeholders in Australia's renewable energy industry awaited the results
of the Council Of Australian Governments (COAG) meeting last weekend on the
issue of
feed
in tariffs.
It was expected that the Government would announce the rollout of a feed in
tariff program similar to the one used by Germany for many years which has been
a runaway success and has made Germany one of the world leaders in solar power
uptake.
Most Australian states already offer feed in tariff programs, but they vary
widely in their terms and amount of payment made to owners of
grid
connected solar power systems for the electricity they produce.
Emerging from the COAG meeting was a set of what some described as vague
principles and a seemingly very much
watered
down scheme. COAG's approach for a national, uniform feed in tariff scheme
would be to provide payment for electricity produced by owners of grid connected
solar power systems "which is at least equal to the value of that energy in the relevant electricity market".
Additionally, any payment over and above the market value for electricity
produced would "be a transitional measure (noting that a national emissions trading system will provide increasing support for low emissions
technologies)".
A key to the success of the
program
in Germany was a uniform rate per kilowatt produced much higher than
market value and guaranteed for 20 years. It was this guarantee that provided
strong incentive to home owners and industry to make the necessary investments
into renewable energy systems.
Another important element missing from the guiding principles set down at
the COAG meeting was the distinction of whether a national feed in tariff scheme
would be based on a gross or net model. Under a gross feed in tariff program,
such as the successful German program, payments would be made on all electricity
generated. The net model only pays on surplus electricity produced. Net feed in
tariff programs have been shown to provide little incentive for the uptake of
solar power installations.
The results of the COAG meeting have done little to stir up interest from
overseas investors. According to an article in the
Sydney
Morning Herald, China's second largest manufacturer of solar panels said it
was poised to invest more in Australia but the COAG meeting had given it
"pause for thought".
Senator Christine Milne of the Australian Greens, who introduced a Private
Member's Bill earlier this year for a national feed-in tariff that would pay a
premium price for gross energy generation from all
renewable
energy technologies, has called the COAG outcome a "failure" and a
"roadblock" for the renewable energy industry in Australia.
Senator Milne has
called
upon the Rudd government to "embrace the range of policy settings
and investments that will back up the ETS and help reduce emissions as
effectively and efficiently as possible. A feed-in tariff is top of the
list."
News for Thursday 04 December, 2008
View all news for Thursday 04 December, 2008 on one page
Recent News
News archive